Search for: All records

The emerging fungal pathogenBatrachochytrium salamandrivorans(Bsal) threatens the diversity of amphibians, particularly in North America where it is projected to invade. Amphibian skin defenses include a mucosal layer containing microorganisms that can potentially modulate host response to pathogens such asBsal. In this study, we focused on the composition of the skin microbiome across life stages of spotted salamanders (Ambystoma maculatum). We also evaluated the stress hormone corticosterone and skin microbiome response to inoculations withBsaland probiotics at both the larval and juvenile developmental stages, and the response to different environmental conditions. Results indicated that both bacterial and fungal communities found on the skin significantly differed in structure and diversity between life stages ofA. maculatum. Exposure to three different probiotics (Bacillus thuringiensis,Chryseobacterium rhizoplanae, andPenicilliumsp.) andBsalevoked shifts in the microbiome of larvae and juveniles, and the metabolite profile of the larval mucosal layer ofA. maculatum. Despite changes in the microbiome, all tested probiotics andBsalwere unable to persist on the skin. Larval bacterial microbiomes shifted in response toBsalandB. thuringiensiswith no significant impacts on antifungal function or bacteria richness, however fungi strongly responded toBsalandB. thuringiensisapplication. This indicates that developmental shifts in the microbiome can be initiated by microbial applications such asB. thuringiensis, a widely used mosquito larvicide. Overall, experimental results indicate that life stage, growth and development, and environmental conditions appeared to be the main factors driving changes in the amphibian skin microbiome and potential anti-Batrachochytriumfunction. 

Invasive fish predators are an important factor causing amphibian declines and may have direct and indirect effects on amphibian survival. For example, early non-lethal exposure to these stressors may reduce survival in later life stages, especially in biphasic species. In amphibians, the glucocorticoid hormone corticosterone is released by the hypothalamo–pituitary–interrenal axis (HPI), as an adaptive physiological response to environmental stressors. The corticosterone response (baseline and response to acute stressors) is highly flexible and context dependent, and this variation can allow individuals to alter their phenotype and behavior with environmental changes, ultimately increasing survival. We sampled larvae of the spring salamander (Gyrinophilus porphyriticus) from two streams that each contained predatory brook trout (Slavelinus fontinalis) in the lower reaches and no predatory brook trout in the upper reaches. We measured baseline and stress-induced corticosterone release rates of larvae from the lower and upper reaches using a non-invasive water-borne hormone assay. We hypothesized that corticosterone release rates would differ between larvae from fish-present reaches and larvae from fish-free reaches. We found that baseline and stressor-induced corticosterone release rates were downregulated in larvae from reaches with fish predators. These results indicate that individuals from reaches with predatory trout are responding to fish predators by downregulating corticosterone while maintaining an active HPI axis. This may allow larvae more time to grow before metamorphosing, while also allowing them to physiologically respond to novel stressors. However, prolonged downregulation of corticosterone release rates can impact growth in post-metamorphic individuals. 

Synopsis Global environmental changes induced by human activities are forcing organisms to respond at an unprecedented pace. At present we have only a limited understanding of why some species possess the capacity to respond to these changes while others do not. We introduce the concept of multidimensional phenospace as an organizing construct to understanding organismal evolutionary responses to environmental change. We then describe five barriers that currently challenge our ability to understand these responses: (1) Understanding the parameters of environmental change and their fitness effects, (2) Mapping and integrating phenotypic and genotypic variation, (3) Understanding whether changes in phenospace are heritable, (4) Predicting consistency of genotype to phenotype patterns across space and time, and (5) Determining which traits should be prioritized to understand organismal response to environmental change. For each we suggest one or more solutions that would help us surmount the barrier and improve our ability to predict, and eventually manipulate, organismal capacity to respond to anthropogenic change. Additionally, we provide examples of target species that could be useful to examine interactions between phenotypic plasticity and adaptive evolution in changing phenospace.